Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Obama's and Merkel's good friend: “I Can’t Condemn” ISIS Downing of Passenger Plane
Turning point in debate on handling migrants

 

David Cameron, under pressure after overseeing what critics see as a lackluster start to the renegotiation of Britain’s ties with the European Union before a referendum, used a speech to offer the most detail yet on where he wants change.

The EU executive was quick to call at least one of the British leader’s demands — a limit on benefits EU migrants to Britain are entitled to — “highly problematic,” while saying other proposals such as boosting the role of national parliaments in decision-making in the bloc appeared feasible.

Cameron left little room for doubt he wants Britain to stay in a reformed European Union, linking for the first time British security to its membership — but he also warned that if his demands were met by a “deaf ear,” he could lobby to leave.

“There will be those who say, here and elsewhere in the EU, that we are embarked on ‘Mission Impossible,’” Cameron told diplomats, reporters and business leaders at the Chatham House think tank in London.

“I do not believe so for a minute … The European Union has a record of solving intractable problems … And that in doing so we can make Britain and the whole of Europe safer and more prosperous for generations to come.”

Shortly afterwards, Cameron addressed ‘Dear Donald’ in a letter to Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, setting out his four main objectives to launch what he called the renegotiation’s “formal phase” before a December summit when EU leaders will hammer out the details of Britain’s new terms.

Tusk said in Brussels that negotiations with the other 27 governments would start next week.

In his speech, Cameron spelt out what he wanted from Brussels and, in one of the most contentious points, proposed that people coming to Britain from the EU must live in the country for four years before qualifying for state benefits.

EU members, especially in Eastern Europe from where hundreds of thousands of people have left for Britain over the years, complain that such a move would be discriminatory, although Cameron said he was “open to different ways of dealing with this issue.”

His calls for financial and economic safeguards for countries outside the 19 member euro zone and for Britain to be excluded from the principle of “ever closer union” may also be difficult, the EU said.

Both could require treaty change, which would be almost impossible to complete in two years and would mean several EU states holding referendums, increasingly difficult as European politics turn increasingly Euroskeptic.

Cameron appealed to EU governments for understanding, saying none of his demands were “outlandish or absurd,” and tried to appease Euroskeptics, including some in his Conservative Party, which has been divided over the EU for decades.

“I must be very, very clear. I don’t want this reasonable approach to be misunderstood. Reasonable does not mean lacking in resolve,” he said.

“We gain from the Union, but we bring a lot to it.”

He underlined that Britain had helped the EU form a strong response to the conflict in Syria and in launching sanctions against Russian officials over the Ukraine crisis.

But he balanced that with what Britons got from the EU, saying the country’s economic security and national security was closely connected to its membership of the bloc.

“So we should be clear that leaving the EU is not some automatic fast track to a land of milk and honey,” he said.

Britain’s Euroskeptics accused the prime minister of setting his sights too low in the renegotiation.

Nigel Farage, the leader of the UK Independence Party, said in statement that Cameron was not aiming for anything “substantial,” while Conservative Euroskeptic Jacob Rees-Mogg lawmaker called his demands “pretty thin gruel.”

The French daily, Liberation, called Cameron’s threat “blackmail.”

Most Britons say they will vote to stay in the European Union, according to opinion polls so far, but the gap has narrowed between the “Yes” and “No” camps largely driven by fears over migration after thousands have arrived on EU shores.

For some, including Britain’s main trade association EEF, they just wanted the negotiations to be concluded.

“It is essential that we remove the uncertainty surrounding our future relationship with the EU and move forward,” it said in a statement.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Obama's and Merkel's good friend: “I Can’t Condemn” ISIS Downing of Passenger Plane
Turning point in debate on handling migrants

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll Up